2.3.41 is dep_bool officially broken? :)

[Jeff Garzik]

On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> No. It is (according to current standard) misuse of dep_bool.
> Look in my postings to l-k with subj: "2.3.41 config: suggested [PATCH]"
> 
> Simple changing that in one place may brake some others.
> Maybe it is good reasom for creating a new config function ?
> How to name it ?
>     dep_bool_mod ?
>     dep_bool_nomod ?

No.  A dependency is a dependency, pure and simple.  It should not
matter whether the dependency is marked as a module or not.

	Jeff




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo en vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/