Preventing gcc from aligning stack???

[Marc Lehmann]

On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 12:44:38PM -0500, Johan Kullstam <kullstam en ne.mediaone.net> wrote:
> judging from lurking on the gcc list it doesn't look like any new
> release is immanent either (since there hasn't been any calls for code
> freezes and such).

Indeed, there won't be a 2.96 (or 2.97, 3.0) very soon, for, ehrm, "minor
lack of developer resources".

There is currently discussion on wether to release a 2.95.3 with all the
bugfixes found on the 2.95 release branch. (I'm all in favour of it).

I haven't checked wether that particular bug was fixed in the 2.95 branch,
though.

> offers a patched version of 2.95.2.  where do the rest of us go for
> working gcc?  are we expected to pull things off the cvs tree at
> cygnus?

There are many versions of gcc without that bug, and if all suffer from
the same bug it is relatively unimportant ;) So up or downgrading should
be an option. Or waiting for the next release.

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg en opengroup.org |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo en vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/