[PATCH] root-hopping for pre-2.3.41-3

[Werner Almesberger]

Horst von Brand wrote:
> As a (mostly) bystander, I find the idea of kernel internal threads
> rooted in the filesystem somewhat strange, to be honest. That's why
> I'd go for getting rid of that "feature".

Some kernel threads may have legitimate reasons for accessing the file
system, e.g. nfsd and khttpd, so you can't just disallow it completely.
Worse yet - some kernel threads may touch file system code in a pretty
non-obvious way, e.g. when lockd spawns a sub-thread, current->fs gets
de-referenced, so if you did an exit_fs first, oops ... (I stopped
looking for other cases after this sobering discovery, so maybe this is
the only one, which could be easily fixed, but I wouldn't bet on it.)

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Well, the reason for it is for orthogonality in the kernel; avoiding
> special cases.  I like the fake root/cwd idea, because it lets us create
> the special case without breaking orthogonality.

Yes, I think it would be good to research this for 2.5. It may be a pain
to get right, though, e.g. I'm not sure if we can build a "dentry jail"
with d_inode == NULL. If we can't, we need an "inode jail" too, and then
maybe a "super block jail" and a "blockdev jail". I hope not, but it may
get pretty complex in the end.

Anyway, I'll document pivot_root(2) (which is in pre-2.3.41-4 - thanks,
Linus !) such that the global chroot happens, but that only a chroot of
the current process can be expeced (not strictly necessary, but gives
better semantics), and extend pivot_root(8) accordingly.

- Werner

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________________
 / Werner Almesberger, ICA, EPFL, CH       werner.almesberger en ica.epfl.ch /
/_IN_N_032__Tel_+41_21_693_6621__Fax_+41_21_693_6610_____________________/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo en vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/