Preventing gcc from aligning stack???

[Jamie Lokier]

David Weinehall wrote:
> > > sched.c:77: warning: alignment of `aligned_data' is greater than maximum
> > > object file alignment
> > 
> > That's not i386 is it?
> 
> 486.

Hmm.  I'm surprised.  Linux 2.3.x only compiles in ELF, and ELF permits
big alignments.  Oddness.

> > Linux uses larger alignments for some things that should be aligned to a
> > cache line, either to reduce SMP inter-processor traffic or simply
> > because it's faster to read fewer cache lines for some critical things.
> 
> I doubt this is a good idea on 386's/486's, but I might be wrong...

On 486s it's a good idea because they have a cache.  cf. Recent patch
from IBM which speeds up the scheduler simply be moving some memory
accesses to within a cache line.  A smaller alignment value might be
more suitable for a 486 though.  Some nominal 386s have a cache too.

enjoy,
-- Jamie


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo en vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/