Constant byteorder macros.

[David Woodhouse]

alan en lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk said:
>  In Linux. The b/w/d is the PCI specification "byte word doubleword"
> sequence

Then it's not too late. Too late for 2.4, perhaps, but not too late. It could 
still be fixed in 2.5.

> How about fixing the 2.3.x bugs and getting 2.4 out before that ?

I can see how that could be considered more appropriate. The only reason I 
brought it up at this time was because of the bug that Francois-Rene pointed 
out, which was presumably caused by the misnaming of the macros.







--
dwmw2



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo en vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/